mathstodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for maths people. We have LaTeX rendering in the web interface!

Server stats:

2.9K
active users

#theoryofeverything

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Continued thread

2/2…many are generally confused by a certain cadre of #Physicists on the one hand describing tools from #StringTheory they know and love on while calling out it’s flaws on the other (that generally being the failure to cough up a viable #TheoryOfEverything) while failing to mention that these are problems with which the entirety of #Physics has also failed at spectacularly. Watch and you’ll know when folks r using string theory tools as explainers while dissing string theory.
#Bastards
🤣☕🤘

GM

I've been listening to a 32-hour lecture series on Thomas Campbell's big Theory of Everything. It's the most fascinating model of consciousness I have ever come across, and aligns with consciousness phenomena that I have experienced in my personal Yogic path and meditations.

Yesterday, I saw that he was a recent guest on Rogan.

I highly recommend checking out his work to anyone who is intuitive and open minded!

https://open.spotify.com/episode/61sh31noVEEHhPWMTVTXHz?si=9e530bcc3171470d

#nostr
#consciousness
#BigTOE
#theoryofeverything
#thomascampbell

#Astrophysicist Matt O'Dowd

…"#physics is insanely successful, most unbelievably successful in its predictive power about #nature. But there's a sense, I think a growing sense, that physics is stalled in this final sprint toward a #theory of #everything"…

🔗 youtube.com/watch?v=syDTVDbzvw 16 Jun 2023
🔗 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_O%2

“Physicists are looking for a theory of everything or a grand unifying theory which, from their point of view, would explain everything that needs to be explained about the nature of our universe. … The problem with that, from my point of view, would be that it doesn't explain how there could be organisms capable of seeking and finding such an explanation. In other words, it's not recursive enough. It doesn't include its own conditions of possibility. And so if we're going to have an explanation for the universe as a whole, including the conscious beings, the conscious biological organisms, that are capable of explaining it, then it's going to require a reference being made to more than just the laws of physics.”
—Matthew Segall
https://youtu.be/V7YLrbGpNNk?feature=shared&t=929
#matthewsegall #physics #theoryofeverything #recursion
Replied in thread

@elduvelle @NicoleCRust @vineettiruvadi

Here's a great quote for you to ponder when you have time, from Alicia Juarrero's new book #ContextChangesEverything:

"according to #reductionism, our intuition that mental processes such as intentions and beliefs have powers to actively bring about meaningful, purposive actions is illusory. Thoughts, feelings, and intentions derive their powers and properties from biology; biology from those of chemistry; chemistry from physics. Properties that appear unique to biological organisms (such as being alive) or human beings (such as symbolic language) can, in principle, be inferred from chemical processes that constitute them. #Causal powers that seem to issue from those higher-level properties can be derived from physical properties, at least in principle. It is not quite “turtles all the way down,” however. The turtle at the bottom (at the level of elementary physics) is special. The primary properties of a-toms, reality’s constituents (read now quarks and electrons), are the real and most simple stuff that does the causal work and provides #explanatory power. Ultimate causes reside in and issue from there. Meaning and purpose are impotent.

Such is the dream of a #theoryofeverything , the promise of an equation that spells out the lawful correlations among microdetails and from which everything else can be derived and precisely predicted."

Replied in thread

#Transspace - Marla Lay

The theory of Transspace has been created by the dutch scientist Marla Lay. She started to work on it during her PhD phase at the end of the 2080s and published the groundbreaking paper in the year 2095.

The theory came with twelve base formulae and didn't contain any singularities anymore like all its predecessors. Yet it could be considered a superset of the theory or relativity and the quantum theory for most aspects. But now, we could also predict the edge cases.

Although Lay was in the lead, she already had a rather big staff and one of the best quantum computer arrays to work with. And also later, she went through an unorthodox path and decided to involve the best scientists and engineers in the world to work on practical proof and potential technical inventions.

Project "Enclave" started in 1996. More in the next post.

#scifi #theoryofeverything #amwriting

@scifi