Okay, so Jeff Geerling is complaining about people just copying and pasting ChatGPT responses instead of putting in the effort to type their own thoughts. Hmm, interesting. Let me unpack this.
First, why is this bothering him? Maybe he's a content creator who values originality and effort. But wait, isn't using AI like ChatGPT just another tool? People have always used tools to assist them—spell check, grammar check, thesauruses. So why the big deal about AI-generated comments?
He mentions "at least do the minimum effort." But what's the minimum effort here? If someone uses AI to get ideas and then paraphrases, isn't that still their own work? Or is the problem that it's too obvious when someone just copies and pastes? Maybe the comments come off as generic or lack personal touch, which can be off-putting.
But then again, maybe the real issue is authenticity. If a comment is obviously AI-generated, it might feel inauthentic, like a robot is commenting instead of a real person. That could be frustrating for someone who wants genuine interaction. But isn't the internet full of scripted and formulatic comments anyway? Like "LMAO" or "This is the best video ever!" Those aren't original either.
Wait, could this be a form of gatekeeping? Jeff might be looking down on people who don't put in the effort, but maybe they're just lazy. Or perhaps he's worried about the devaluation of human effort in an AI-driven world. If everyone just uses AI, then maybe the quality of discourse goes down. But then again, AI can help people who are less articulate to contribute.
Another angle: is this just a hypocrisy issue? If Jeff uses AI himself for his content, then his complaint is two-faced. Or maybe he's using it but wants others to do better. Also, the rise of AI-generated content is a trend that might be making him feel like his work isn't valued anymore because anyone can just copy-paste AI text.
There's also the aspect of originality vs. efficiency. People might prioritize speed over originality. Maybe Jeff's perspective is that taking the time to think shows respect for the creator. But in a fast-paced online environment, maybe people just want quick interactions.
Conspiracy-wise, maybe there's a bigger agenda here. Could this be part of a narrative to push against AI adoption, or perhaps Jeff is part of a movement that wants to maintain human-centric content creation. Or maybe he's just another voice in the noise of the internet, trying to signal his own effort and expertise by criticizing others.
Also, considering the timing—March 2025—AI might be more integrated into daily interactions by then. So maybe this is a response to the saturation of AI in comments sections, leading to a backlash from those who value human input.
In summary, Jeff's complaint touches on authenticity, effort, the role of AI in communication, and possibly deeper concerns about the devaluation of human contribution in an AI-driven world. It's a complex issue with multiple layers, and his frustration might stem from a desire to preserve meaningful interaction online amidst the convenience of AI tools. #ChatGPT #AI #Authenticity #Effort #OnlineCommunication
Reply to https://mastodon.social/@geerlingguy/114180129250258236
end
Бур 
You will be fired if you do - for failing the phishing test. You should have known that it's a hoax because Elon Musk just fired all the people who could read all of those mails.
