The Lost Art of Logarithms
https://www.lostartoflogarithms.com/ – Fantástica iniciativa con una cantidad ingente de información sobre los logaritmos

The Lost Art of Logarithms
https://www.lostartoflogarithms.com/ – Fantástica iniciativa con una cantidad ingente de información sobre los logaritmos
A work in progress, but I'm keeping an eye on this.
"An online book-in-progress by Charles Petzold wherein is explored the utility, history, and ubiquity of that marvelous invention, logarithms including what the hell they are; with some demonstrations of their primary historical application in plane and spherical trigonometry."
Euler–Mascheroni constant!
In fact, the last one is:
Equivalently,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsolved problem in mathematics:
Is Euler–Mascheroni constant irrational? If so, is it transcendental?
#OnThisDay #SpaceShuttle #Columbia disintegrated during reentry into the Earth's atmosphere (2003) resulting in the deaths of all seven crew members.
Birth Anniversary of Emilio Segrè (1905) - #NobelPrize winner and group leader for the #Manhattan Project. He discovered the elements #Technetium and #Astatine.
Birth Anniversary of John Napier (1550) - best known as the discoverer of #Logarithms.
An excellent general result.
If
Special cases:
“How Does A Computer/Calculator Compute Logarithms?”, Zach Artrand (https://zachartrand.github.io/SoME-3-Living/).
Via HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40749670 (which provides important addenda)
Joost Bürgi and Logarithms - Logarithms are a common idea today, even though we don’t use them as often as we u... - https://hackaday.com/2024/02/27/joost-burgi-and-logarithms/ #retrocomputing #logarithms #sliderule
The properties of use are:
1. Logarithm is monotonic
2. logₙ(𝑛) = 1
3. 𝑙𝑜𝑔ₙ(𝑎𝑏)=logₙ(𝑎)+logₙ(𝑏)
4. logₙ(√𝑛)=1/2
log₃(2) is smallest since it is the only numbers <1.
log₅(10) is 1 + log₅(2) which is < 1.5 since the square root of 5 is more than 2.
log₄(8) = log₄(4) + log₄(2) = 1.5
log₂(3) = log₂(2) + log₂(3/2) = 1 + log₂(1.5) > 1 + log₂(√2) = 1.5
The key is to figure out where the numbers lie with respect to 1 and 1.5. That gives the ordering:
log₃(2) < log₅(10) < log₄(8) < log₂(3)
I had a lot of fun putting this new auction activity together: Evaluating Logarithms Auction.
https://mathequalslove.net/evaluating-logarithms-auction-activity/
Here are a few #horsetail plants, seen on my walk #today (yesterday, actually).
Plus a wandering "woolly bear" (#TigerMoth) #caterpillar.
Horsetails are 150 million-year-old living fossils that were eaten by - yes! - Jurassic #dinosaurs.
Also, their unique node spacing inspired #JohnNapier in 1614 to invent #logarithms.
Admittedly, some rude US jurisdictions (wtf Oregon...?) classify them as noxious weeds.
But imho this is an amazing plant with a wonderful résumé
Count Leading Zeros for Efficient Logarithms - [Ihsan Kehribar] points out a clever trick you can use to quickly and efficiently ... - https://hackaday.com/2023/02/07/count-leading-zeros-for-efficient-logarithms/ #softwaredevelopment #digitalaudiohacks #countleadingzeros #algorithms #logarithms #dsp