Follow

It was astonishingly complicated to derive this example of Poncelet's porism from Cayley's innocent-looking criteria.

· · Web · 1 · 2 · 3

@mathcination I'd be tempted to draw a standard regular hendecagram first, apply a projective transformation to perturb it from the standard form, and call it done, rather than trying to derive it from first principles.

@11011110 If the goal is to create examples, yes, this is absolutely the way to go. I was trying to get a feel for Cayley's criterion and after getting the following result already for the 2x2 determinant case, I cannot recommend going my way:

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mathstodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!