mathstodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for maths people. We have LaTeX rendering in the web interface!

Server stats:

2.8K
active users

The number pi has an evil twin! It's a number called ϖ with many properties similar to π. There are even mutant trig functions connected to this number, called sl and cl.

So maybe while you were studying trig in high school, some kid in another galaxy was having to memorize all the identities for these other functions.

I doubt it. Just as pi and trig functions are connected to the circle, this number ϖ and its mutant trig functions are connected to a curve shaped like the symbol for infinity, ∞. But this curve is just less important than the circle. I'm not enough of a cultural relativist to believe there's a civilization that cares more about the shape ∞ than the shape ◯.

This ∞-shaped curve is called a 'lemniscate', and ϖ is called the 'lemniscate constant'. I'll show you the lemniscate in my next post.

A civilization will probably only get interested in ϖ when it gets interested in the lemniscate.... or the deeper math it's connected to. On our planet, it was Bernoulli, Euler and Gauss who discovered this math.

(Why does unicode even have the symbol ϖ? Here's why: it's a script version of the Greek letter pi, sometimes called 'varpi' or 'pomega'.)

(1/n)

Take 2 points. Draw all the curves where the product of the distances from these 2 points is some constant or other. These are called the 'ovals of Cassini'.

There's one that's special, shaped like ∞. This is the 'lemniscate'. This is the one connected to pi's evil twin.

Here's a formula for the lemniscate in polar coordinates:

r² = cos2θ

Just as the perimeter of the unit circle is 2π, the perimeter of this curve is 2ϖ where

ϖ ≈ 2.62205755...

People have computed this number to over a trillion digits.

Just as we can use the circle to define the trig functions sin and cos, we can use this curve to define functions called sl and cl. Most of the usual trig identities have mutant versions that work for sl and cl. For example just as we have

sin²θ + cos²θ = 1

we have

sl²θ + cl²θ + sl²θ cl²θ = 1

To see a graph of sl and cl, go here:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemnisca

But I want to show you some formulas for π and ϖ!

(2/n)

@johncarlosbaez
I really don't understand this: "Just as the perimeter of a circle is 2π, the perimeter of this curve is 2ϖ".

Well, technically, the perimeter of a circle is 2π time its radius, so I expect the lemniscate's perimeter is 2ϖ times "some radius". What is it? On a circle it's obvious but not on an 8-shaped curve.

John Carlos Baez

@gsrdzl - I should indeed have said the perimeter of the *unit* circle is 2π. I'll fix that. Thanks. The rest, I think, is clear:

"Here's a formula for the lemniscate in polar coordinates:

r² = cos2θ

Just as the perimeter of [the unit] circle is 2π, the perimeter of this curve is 2ϖ where

ϖ ≈ 2.62205755..."

So, "this curve" is the curve I wrote down above.

Here's another way to put it: the perimeter of the curve

𝑥²+𝑦²=1

is 2π, and the perimeter of the following version of Bernoulli's lemniscate is 2ϖ:

(𝑥²+𝑦²)² = 𝑥²−𝑦²

This is the same as I wrote down in polar coordinates above.

@johncarlosbaez
OK. According to Wikipedia, the equation for a Bernoulli's lemniscate in the general case is

(𝑥²+𝑦²)² = a²(𝑥²−𝑦²).

So, is the parameter a the analogue of a radius? In other words, is the perimeter of a non-unit lemniscate equal to 2ϖa?

@gsrdzl - yes, a is analogous to the radius. And I now see that a is the distance between the origin and the rightmost point on this lemniscate:

(𝑥²+𝑦²)² = a²(𝑥²−𝑦²).

since that point has x = a, y = 0. So it is geometrically not a terrible concept of radius!

Thanks for making Christmas more fun.

@johncarlosbaez @gsrdzl In the case of a non-unit lemniscate I think the perimeter would be 2ϖa, where a is the half-width, the distance from the center to the farthest point of the leminscate. On this wikipedia page, en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemnis, there is a formula for a non-unit lemniscate curve, which is the same as the unit curve but with an a^2 factor multiplying the quadratic terms. If a is one, the equation and the perimeter expression reduce to the unit case . So I think it is plausible.

en.m.wikipedia.orgLemniscate of Bernoulli - Wikipedia

@gsrdzl @davidruffner - I did a bit of work to check, and yes David's remarks are all correct.

@johncarlosbaez @gsrdzl : But notice that (x2+y2)2=x2y2 is not analogous to x2+y2=1 but rather to the rightward-shifted half-unit circle x2+y2=x. Whereas on x2+y2=1, the coordinates of a point are the sine and cosine of a related arclength; on x2+y2=x, some related arclengths are the sine and cosine of the distance of a point from the origin. And on (x2+y2)2=x2y2, the analogous arclengths are the lemniscate sine and lemniscate cosine of the distance of a point from the origin. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemnisca for diagrams.

en.wikipedia.orgLemniscate elliptic functions - Wikipedia

@TobyBartels @gsrdzl - yes, the lemniscate

r² = cos2θ

is analogous to the circle

r² = cosθ

which is Toby's circle

𝑥²+𝑦²=𝑥

and this paves the way for higher generalizations, pursued by @duetosymmetry here:

math.ucr.edu/home/baez//diary/

@johncarlosbaez @gsrdzl @duetosymmetry : The circle is r=cosθ, not r2=cosθ. This suggests that the generalization is rn=cos(nθ), but I haven't checked if this is the same as Leo's generalization. (Which for those who haven't clicked through is based on arcsinx=0(1x2)1/2 and arcslx=0(1x4)1/2, so 0(1x2n)1/2 in general.)

@TobyBartels - whoops! My slide showed Leo's actual generalization.

@johncarlosbaez : Good, it's the same (except that my n is Leo's k, and Leo's n is my 2n).