mathstodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for maths people. We have LaTeX rendering in the web interface!

Server stats:

2.9K
active users

#MinimalNegationOperator

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/03

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on Logical Graphs, encompassing several families of graph‑theoretic structures originally developed by Charles S. Peirce as graphical formal languages or visual styles of syntax amenable to interpretation for logical applications.

Please follow the above link for the full set of resources.
Articles and blog series on the core ideas are linked below.

Beginnings —

Logical Graphs • First Impressions
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08

Logical Graphs • Formal Development
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/09

Elements —

Logic Syllabus
oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus

Logical Graphs
oeis.org/wiki/Logical_Graphs

Minimal Negation Operators
oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation

Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems
oeis.org/wiki/Propositional_Eq

Examples —

Peirce's Law
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/10
oeis.org/wiki/Peirce%27s_law

Praeclarum Theorema
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/10
oeis.org/wiki/Logical_Graphs#P

Proof Animations
oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/

Excursions —

Cactus Language
oeis.org/wiki/Cactus_Language_

Futures Of Logical Graphs
oeis.org/wiki/Futures_Of_Logic

Applications —

Applications of a Propositional Calculator • Constraint Satisfaction Problems
academia.edu/4727842/Applicati

Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Sequential Observation Data
oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/

Differential Analytic Turing Automata
oeis.org/wiki/Differential_Ana

Survey of Theme One Program
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/02



Inquiry Into Inquiry · Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on Logical Graphs, encompassing several families of graph-theoretic structures originally developed by Charles S. Peirce as graphical formal langua…

Functional Logic • Inquiry and Analogy • Preliminaries
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06

Functional Logic • Inquiry and Analogy
oeis.org/wiki/Functional_Logic

This report discusses C.S. Peirce's treatment of analogy, placing it in relation to his overall theory of inquiry. We begin by introducing three basic types of reasoning Peirce adopted from classical logic. In Peirce's analysis both inquiry and analogy are complex programs of logical inference which develop through stages of these three types, though normally in different orders.

Note on notation. The discussion to follow uses logical conjunctions, expressed in the form of concatenated tuples e1ek, and minimal negation operations, expressed in the form of bracketed tuples (e1,,ek), as the principal expression-forming operations of a calculus for boolean-valued functions, that is, for propositions. The expressions of this calculus parse into data structures whose underlying graphs are called “cacti” by graph theorists. Hence the name “cactus language” for this dialect of propositional calculus.

Resources —

Logic Syllabus
oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus

Boolean Function
oeis.org/wiki/Boolean_function

Boolean-Valued Function
oeis.org/wiki/Boolean-valued_f

Logical Conjunction
oeis.org/wiki/Logical_conjunct

Minimal Negation Operator
oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation



Inquiry Into InquiryFunctional Logic • Inquiry and Analogy • PreliminariesFunctional Logic • Inquiry and Analogy This report discusses C.S. Peirce’s treatment of analogy, placing it in relation to his overall theory of inquiry.  We begin by introduci…

Logic Syllabus • Discussion 1
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06

Re: Logic Syllabus ( inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-s )
Re: Laws of Form ( groups.io/g/lawsofform/topic/l )
Re: John Mingers ( groups.io/g/lawsofform/message )

JM: ❝In a previous post you mentioned the minimal negation operator. Is there also the converse of this, i.e. an operator which is true when exactly one of its arguments is true? Or is this just XOR?❞

Yes, the “just one true” operator is a very handy tool. We discussed it earlier under the headings of “genus and species relations” or “radio button logic”. Viewed in the form of a venn diagram it describes a partition of the universe of discourse into mutually exclusive and exhaustive regions.

Reading (x1,,xm) to mean just one of x1,,xm is false, the form ((x1),,(xm)) means just one of x1,,xm is true.

For two logical variables, though, the cases “condense” or “degenerate” and saying “just one true” is the same thing as saying “just one false”.

((x1),(x2))=(x1,x2)=x1+x2=xor(x1,x2).

There's more information on the following pages.

Minimal Negation Operators
oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation

Related Truth Tables
oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation

Genus, Species, Pie Charts, Radio Buttons
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/11

Related Discussions
inquiryintoinquiry.com/?s=Radi



Inquiry Into InquiryLogic Syllabus • Discussion 1Re: Logic Syllabus Re: Laws of Form • John Mingers JM: In a previous post you mentioned the minimal negation operator.  Is there also the converse of this, i.e. an operator which is true …
Continued thread