mathstodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for maths people. We have LaTeX rendering in the web interface!

Server stats:

2.8K
active users

#liegroups

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

I am working my way through Adams's "Lectures on Exceptional Lie Groups", and I am not satisfied with the proof for his proposition 4.2 (which states the even subalgebra for the Clifford Algebra Cl(V)0 has 1 irreducible representation when dim(V)=m=2n+1 and 2 irreducible representations when dim(V)=m=2n with certain specific weights).

The argument seems to be to relate representations of an Abelian subgroup E={j=1mejijij=0 or 1} and E0=ECl(V)0 [where ej form the canonical basis for V] to representations of R[E]/(ν+1)Cl(V), the quotient of the group algebra R[E] modulo the identification of the square of the generators ej2=ν with -1.

I'm with Adams until he picks a complex 1-dimensional representation W of F, because he starts working with *COMPLEX* representations. But Adams triumphantly announces "We thus get a representation, Δ of E0..." then shows it is irreducible. I'm fine with it being irreducible from the character relations, that's fine.

Even supposing this is an irreducible representation for C[E0], I don't quite see how to obtain an irrep for Cl(V)0; I am guessing just extend it "in the obvious way"? Does this preserve irreducibility?

Replied in thread

@xameer

Cf. • Discussion 3
inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/06

once had a ( of ) long before did but physics learned to reduce complexity through the use of and (combined in ). One of the promising features of is their relationship to . So I’ve been looking into that. Here’s a link, a bit in medias res, but what I’ve got for now.

Inquiry Into InquiryDifferential Logic • Discussion 3By Jon Awbrey

Quantum mechanics anyone? Dozens have been disappointed by UCLA’s administration ineptly standing in the way of Dr. Mike Miller being able to offer his perennial Winter UCLA math class (Ring Theory this quarter), so a few friends and I are putting our informal math and physics group back together.

We’re mounting a study group on quantum mechanics based on Peter Woit‘s Introduction to Quantum Mechanics course from 2022. We’ll be using his textbook Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations:An Introduction (free, downloadable .pdf) and his lectures from YouTube.

Shortly, we’ll arrange a schedule and some zoom video calls to discuss the material. If you’d like to join us, send me your email or leave a comment so we can arrange meetings (likely via Zoom or similar video conferencing).

Our goal is to be informal, have some fun, but learn something along the way. The suggested mathematical background is some multi-variable calculus and linear algebra. Many of us already have some background in Lie groups, algebras, and representation theory and can hopefully provide some help for those who are interested in expanding their math and physics backgrounds.

Everyone is welcome! 

#group-theory #lie-groups #peter-woit #physics #quantum-mechanics #representation-theory

https://boffosocko.com/2023/01/26/quantum-mechanics-study-group-for-peter-woit/

I really enjoyed the paper

Oteo & Ros, Why Magnus expansion?, URL: doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2021. (paywall)

and not just because it cites a paper of mine (though it does help!)

It's a historical/personal reflection on the Magnus expansion, a series solution to the differential equation x(t)=A(t)x(t) which I describe below the fold. (1/n, n≈7)

Taylor & FrancisWhy Magnus expansionA short story about the origins of Magnus Expansion, why we got involved and how it led us to meet Geometric Integration. We present a biographical draft of Wilhelm Magnus, a sketchy discussion of ...