Chuck Darwin<p>Michel Talagrand took home the 2024 <a href="https://c.im/tags/Abel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Abel</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Prize" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Prize</span></a> for his work on stochastic systems, randomness and a proof of a physics reaction that many experts thought was unsolvable</p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/Talagrand" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Talagrand</span></a>’s work focuses on <a href="https://c.im/tags/stochastic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>stochastic</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/systems" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>systems</span></a>, which model random variables within a given time and space. </p><p>Over years of work, he came to make sense of such systems, using mathematical inequalities, to better characterize the limits of their variability.</p><p>Where to safely build a house along a rushing waterway, or how to anticipate the growth of a bacterial population, for example, are problems with solutions that may be closely predicted using Talagrand’s methods. </p><p>The water level in a river may be random, but the mathematician’s work can discern its likely maximum level, which would advise where to construct buildings to avoid flooding, writes the New York Times’ Kenneth Chang.</p><p>Essentially, his inequalities, which convert complex systems into geometrical terms, create precise estimates. </p><p>They offer new tools for study and applications in other fields, including physics, chemistry, communications and ecology.</p><p>“There are papers posted maybe on a daily basis where the punchline is ‘now we use Talagrand’s inequalities,’” Assaf Naor, a mathematician at Princeton University, tells Nature News.</p><p>The Abel committee also commended another element of Talagrand’s work, which shows that even random systems have an element of predictability. </p><p>For example, flipping a coin 1,000 times will predictably yield close to 500 heads and 500 tails. The same thought process can be applied to travel routes, and Talagrand’s principles provide convincing proof.</p><p>“It’s like a piece of art,” Helge Holden, a mathematician at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and the Abel committee chair, tells Nature News. </p><p>“The magic here is to find a good estimate, not just a rough estimate.”</p><p>Talagrand also earned recognition for providing a proof for a physics problem that many scientists thought could never be explained by pure mathematics. Giorgio Parisi shared the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics for his 1979 work in predicting spin glasses, which describe the states and random behaviors of condensed magnetic atoms.</p><p>After five years of effort, Talagrand—and, separately, Italian physicist Francesco Guerra—provided the mathematical basis for Parisi’s work in the early 2000s.</p><p>“It’s one thing to believe that the conjecture is correct, but it’s another to prove it, and my belief was that it was a problem so difficult it could not be proved,” Parisi tells New Scientist’s Alex Wilkins.<br><a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/mathematician-who-made-sense-of-the-universes-randomness-wins-maths-top-prize-180984020/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/</span><span class="invisible">mathematician-who-made-sense-of-the-universes-randomness-wins-maths-top-prize-180984020/</span></a></p>