JCLS<p>Feldkamp et al. reveal diverse perspectives on literary quality and show that expert opinion often conflicts with crowd-sourced ratings &amp; award nominations, highlighting the complexity of measuring literary quality. <a href="https://doi.org/10.48694/jcls.3908" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.48694/jcls.3908</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> <a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/CLS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CLS</span></a> <a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/CCLS24" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CCLS24</span></a> <a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/LiteraryQuality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LiteraryQuality</span></a> <a href="https://fedihum.org/tags/CulturalAnalytics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CulturalAnalytics</span></a></p>