Preston Maness ☭<p>An excellent interview conducted between Maggie Quinlan Thompson of the Austin Chronicle and Texas state senator Sarah Eckhardt, who represents the Austin area:</p><p><a href="https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2025-04-11/sitting-down-with-your-senator/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">austinchronicle.com/news/2025-</span><span class="invisible">04-11/sitting-down-with-your-senator/</span></a></p><p>The entire interview does an *excellent* job of interjecting important bits of context when needed. That is a breath of fresh air compared to raw dumps of dialog that assume every reader/listener is just as wired in to said context as the writers/speakers.</p><p>As well, one point in particular makes a very concise and convincing case against bad political theatre, likening it, across several important political axes, to nutritionally barren candy:</p><p>>**Chronicle**: *You were talking about political pragmatism, which could be thought of as political performance. Before you were an attorney, you studied arts and performed in theatre productions. We have this phrase “political theatre,” which implies something nefarious, but in a pure sense of what theatre is, is there artistry in the work of being a lawmaker?*<br>><br>>*Eckhardt*: As a public servant you have to tell the story outside the building, so I don’t consider political theatre a bad thing. I think you need to be sufficiently theatrical, a sufficient storyteller, so that your community knows what their government is up to.<br>><br>>There are also posturing bills. These are examples of really bad theatre. It’s candy politics. It has no nutritional value. It doesn’t increase your public safety. It doesn’t increase your prosperity. It doesn’t improve your health care. It doesn’t reduce the price of groceries. It’s purely about looking good and doesn’t do any good.</p><p>Finally, another salient piece of advice regarding the intersection of ego and politics:</p><p>>**Chronicle**: *Do you feel genuine partnership and teamwork with many or any of your Republican colleagues?*<br>><br>>**Eckhardt**: One way I can get policy passed is by quietly talking to my Republican colleagues and acting like a superstaffer saying, “Hey, I read your bill. I think it’s really, really good. I can’t vote for it yet. Here are a couple of things that would improve it, that would make it possible for me to vote for it.”<br>><br>>Another way I can influence policy is I can propose a bill and file it and then float it to see how many Republicans I can get to co-author, and if I can’t get any to co-author, but one of them says, “I really like this bill, but politically, I can’t be seen on a bill with you.” I’ll say: “file the identical bill, and I’ll co-author yours. Take my bill. Cool.” You can get a lot more done if you don’t need your name on it.</p><p>You can get a lot more done if you don’t need your name on it.</p><p>You can get a lot more done if you don’t need your name on it.</p><p>You can get a lot more done if you don’t need your name on it.</p><p><a href="https://tenforward.social/tags/atx" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>atx</span></a> <a href="https://tenforward.social/tags/txpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>txpol</span></a> <a href="https://tenforward.social/tags/txlege" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>txlege</span></a> <a href="https://tenforward.social/tags/AustinChronicle" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AustinChronicle</span></a> <a href="https://tenforward.social/tags/austin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>austin</span></a> <a href="https://tenforward.social/tags/AustinTX" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AustinTX</span></a></p>