Peter Krautzberger @pkra@mathstodon.xyz

When your lists start to include theorems and their proofs, maybe just make it a subsection?

TFW the nested refs was an authoring error.

Catastrophe (of nested links in HTML) narrowly avoided....

Fix for mathstodon.xyz users:

$$\begin{align} & \text{The number of elements in larger blocks in $\mathcal{Q}$ than in $\mathcal{P}$ is at} \tag{*}\\ & \text{least the sum $\gamma '$ of the $k{+}1$ smallest blocks in the reduced $\mathcal{P}$.} \end{align}$$

TeX book: "Text mode for text, math mode for math."

authors:

$$\begin{align} & \text{The number of elements in larger blocks in $\mathcal{Q}$ than in $\mathcal{P}$ is at} \tag{*}\\ & \text{least the sum $\gamma '$ of the $k{+}1$ smallest blocks in the reduced $\mathcal{P}$.} \end{align}$$

Things you don't often hear from mathematicians:

"Because LaTeX is bad at doing good page breaking, the publisher needs to go through the pdf and latex source carefully to fix things by hand."

And on an open issue tracker no less. (Intentionally not linked.)

Remembering that one time when an author wrote in that their 1300p manuscript was ready, everybody went "who you?", and it turned out their contract dated from a time before the imprint was bought and before any of the current staff was hired.

O to be an academic... Of silkworm size or immense...

Geistesblitz: kommt der Email-Reminder von Bonn Orange zu der Uhrzeit, an der ich den Aktivierungslink geklickt hatte???

I'm not saying you can't number figures as Fig 1, Fig 2 etc and reset the counter on each chapter.

But if you then have to hack around so that references to other chapters say e.g. "see Fig 2.1" while references within the chapter say e.g., "see Fig 1", then maybe you're not doing your readers a favor.

"If $k = 0$ (mod 360), we ..."

Sigh, no.