Pinned toot

YOU MATHEMATICIANS THINK YOU SO SMART, THAN EXPLAIN THIS!!1!

I decided that the world needed to see the Maclaurin series thrashing like a screen door in a hurricane.

New math post on my blog: Convergence of Taylor series blog.plover.com/math/exponenti

Wikipedia has this animation of the Maclaurin series converging for e^x, but it emphasizes the right-hand side, where the behavior is much less bizarre, and only hints at the left-hand side where the partial sums flap back and forth like a screen door in a hurricane.

New math post on my blog: The exponential function is a miracle blog.plover.com/math/exponenti

New math post on my blog: Technical devices for reducing the number of axioms blog.plover.com/math/technical

New math post on my blog: Obtuse axiomatization of category theory blog.plover.com/math/freyd-the

New math post on my blog: Projection morphisms are (not) epic blog.plover.com/math/epic-proj

New math post on my blog: The inside-outness of category theory blog.plover.com/math/category-

New math post on my blog: What's the difference between 0/0 and 1/0? blog.plover.com/math/division-

I was momentarily excited to discover that János Pach has a blog! But then I saw that it has only one nontrivial post, from 2010. pachjanos.wordpress.com/

In which I complain about mathematical jargon and identify some candidates for the worst example. blog.plover.com/lang/math-jarg

New math post on my blog: Sometimes it matters how you get there blog.plover.com/math/sometimes

Generating 4d polyhedra from their symmetries: syntopia.github.io/Polytopia/p

By Mikael Hvidtfeldt Christensen, via a year-old post on newly-defunct Google+: web.archive.org/web/2019030607

…Professor Snorfus, the world's foremost expert in the theory of smooth prime numbers…

The set of real and pure imaginary numbers is analogous to the set of even and odd functions $\Bbb R→ \Bbb R$. math.stackexchange.com/q/31786

New math post on my blog: More about the happy numeric coincidence blog.plover.com/math/power-dig

I spent some time today thinking about how long it would take me to produce a table of sines and cosines by hand. Of course it depends on the density and the precision of the table, but my conclusion was that it wouldn't take excessively long. I'd start by calculating sin 1° using the Maclaurin series, then use angle addition formulas to work up to 2°, 4°, , etc, to 90°.

New math post on my blog: A happy numeric coincidence blog.plover.com/math/power-dig

Not only 17³ = 4193, but also 170^{31} = 1392889173388510144614180174894677204330000000000000000000000000000000 AND 170^{33} = 40254497110927943179349807054456171205137000000000000000000000000000000000 😀

A Mastodon instance for maths people. The kind of people who make $\pi z^2 \times a$ jokes.
Use $ and $ for inline LaTeX, and $ and $ for display mode.