mathstodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for maths people. We have LaTeX rendering in the web interface!

Server stats:

2.8K
active users

#their

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

For the ultra-wealthy, money is effectivey not finite.

It's just a resource to be pointed at any burning thing.

The most counterintutive thing is that, ♦️not only is the money faucet #boundless for them,
but in fact,
♦️most of the money coming out of the faucet is #not #their #own.

👉 People who control large pools of money are very, very eager to let billionaires use their money.

Once we understand this fundamental difference, everything becomes clear.

⭐️Having access to a nearly limitless flow of funds lets you exert power over things that can be controlled by money. ⭐

And that's a lot of things.

In economics, there's even terminology for the different ways of looking at resources: 🌟stock and flow. 🌟

For you, money is a #stock, a bucket of dollars you can carry, and that you try to make sure isn't empty.

For the ultra-wealthy, money is a #flow, it's just a hose of dollars that you can point at anything that isn't suiting your preferences.

With that context in mind, revisit your assumptions about how the ultra-wealthy influence things like policymaking and social norms.

Even in the most positive, charitable case, you may wonder,
"If this person has a bilion dollars, why don't they just pay for [good things for people in need]?"

But in many cases, even if they were inclined to help with that particular cause or need,
♦️dropping a large sum of money at a particular moment would require them to treat their money on hand as a stock instead of a flow,
♦️and that reduces their economic power over time.

In a "nice framing", this is about ensuring they're leveraging other people's money over time to sustain their ability to give to that cause.

Put more "cynically", 💥 you can't exert control over something if you've already stopped paying for it.

The next time you're trying to understand the decisions that the ultra-wealthy make when they are attempting to shape our world,
challenge yourself to rethink the assumptions you may have about the way that they use money.

It is a fundamentally different tool for them than it is for anyone who only has a limited bucket of bucks.

anildash.com/2024/07/02/money-

Anil DashSystems: How the Ultra-Wealthy Think About MoneyBy Anil Dash

This "Magnificent Tree Frog" actually likes to live among rocks; whatevs. Discovered in western Australia's far north on a sanctuary, these frogs have yellow & blue skin tones but the yellow is inhibited, making the entire surface blue. It's totally cool, I get it, but why aren't we hearing more about where they get their little toupees?
#magnificent #tree #rock #frogs #blue #skin #yellow #inhibited #not a #green #frog as #usual #but #what #about #their #little #toupees?abc.net.au/news/2024-07-12/sci

ABC News · Scientists make chance discovery of rare blue skin mutation in Kimberley magnificent tree frogBy Elaenor Nield
Continued thread

It’s probably safe to say that few, if any, judges have had to deal w/the array of #threats to #their trial that Justice #Merchan has had to. Besides #Trump himself, who constantly tests the boundaries of his #GagOrder, there are his allies who attacking the judge & his family & who aren’t covered by the gag order. Then there’s the #media who has been putting potentially identifying info about prospective #jurors on TV.

Replied in thread

@mflx
We do not have to agree, of course.
But I think you are mistaken here. Regardless of what the product or service or business is, multi-specialization guarantees that there is "redundancy of mastery". In complexity, that redundancy is necessary to cope with surprise.

An observation: The "It depends on the product!" argument is popular. It usually comes from people who overestimate the complexity of #their business and underestimate the complexity of businesses they do not know much about.