mathstodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for maths people. We have LaTeX rendering in the web interface!

Server stats:

2.8K
active users

#snowclone

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Nora Dimitrijević<p>Here's one for the <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/snowclone" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>snowclone</span></a> database: "X has a well-known Y bias"</p><p>Originally a Colbert-ism [1] directed at Bush (X = reality, Y = liberal), but I've seen it used fruitfully with other values of X and Y.</p><p>[1]: <a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4698442/user-clip-reality-liberal-bias" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">c-span.org/video/?c4698442/use</span><span class="invisible">r-clip-reality-liberal-bias</span></a></p>
JordiGH<p>For a while I&#39;ve been trying to figure out where the &quot;X 2: The X-ening&quot; <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/snowclone" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>snowclone</span></a> comes from. The closest I&#39;ve gotten to the source of where this sequel-is-dumb thing comes from is from &quot;Highlander 2: The Quickening&quot;, because didn&#39;t the first movie very clearly state that there could only be one?</p><p>But I haven&#39;t been able to find patient zero from &quot;Highlander 2: the Quickening&quot; to &quot;Highlander 2: The Highlanderening&quot;.</p><p>Anyone know?</p>
James Cuff<p>Made a <a href="https://mastodon.mit.edu/tags/gpt" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>gpt</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.mit.edu/tags/snowclone" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>snowclone</span></a> about the recent <a href="https://mastodon.mit.edu/tags/clonewars" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>clonewars</span></a> by asking a 2021 GPT to predict what a pair of thought leaders might do. </p><p>"What Would Jeff Do?" 😆 </p><p>Seems about right. </p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7086441917911023616/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:l</span><span class="invisible">i:activity:7086441917911023616/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.mit.edu/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>linux</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.mit.edu/tags/rhel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>rhel</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.mit.edu/tags/opensource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>opensource</span></a></p>
Curmudgeon<p>Your seasonal reminder that the Inuit have 47 different words for what we call <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/linguistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>linguistics</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/snowclone" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>snowclone</span></a></p>
JordiGH<p>I can&#39;t find a definitive answer to this, but I&#39;m pretty sure that the meme of calling the sequel, to say, &quot;Chair&quot; as &quot;Chair 2: The Chairening&quot; comes from the awful sequel &quot;Highlander 2: The Quickening&quot;.</p><p>The only part that isn&#39;t clear is how did the <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/snowclone" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>snowclone</span></a> go from the &quot;X 2: The Y-ening&quot; to &quot;X 2: The X-ening&quot;.</p>
JordiGH<p>So, quick theory here on the -ening suffix being added to lame movie sequels: (e.g.Shark 2: The Sharkening): Highlander II: The Quickening played the title straight. It&#39;s not &quot;the highlending&quot; or whatever, but it has almost the same structure and is a ridiculous premise after the first movie VERY CLEARLY stated how many there could be. It was also awful and critically panned.</p><p>Hip skippity hop, modify it a little, and we have the exploitable X 2: The Xening <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/snowclone" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>snowclone</span></a>.</p><p>Agree?</p>