Ercanbrack<p>Please boost!</p><p>I have a question for all of you Linux experts out there :</p><p>Is there a relationship between a tickless kernel (CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL in the kernel config), & the RTC interrupt frequency, or do they do two different things?</p><p>In other words, if your kernel is running tickless, is there any audio latency benefit from increasing the highest requested RTC interrupt frequency—or, is it no longer relevant?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Linux</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/LinuxAudio" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LinuxAudio</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Fedora" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fedora</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Debian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Debian</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Ubuntu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Ubuntu</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Arch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Arch</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Kernel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Kernel</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Audio" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Audio</span></a></p>