Mathstodon

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Jon AwbreyPragmatic Cosmos • 1 • <a href="https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09/21/pragmatic-cosmos-1-a/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no">https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/09/21/pragmatic-cosmos-1-a/</a>Re: Michael Harris • Not About Fibonacci • <a href="https://mathematicswithoutapologies.wordpress.com/about-the-author/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no">https://mathematicswithoutapologies.wordpress.com/about-the-author/</a> • <a href="https://mathematicswithoutapologies.wordpress.com/2016/06/09/not-about-fibonacci/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no">https://mathematicswithoutapologies.wordpress.com/2016/06/09/not-about-fibonacci/</a>I have often reflected on the interminglings of the main three normative sciences. In one of my earliest meditations I saw Beauty, Goodness, and Truth as the intersecting circles of a Venn diagram, with the “summum bonum” the central cell.As far as our ability to approach our object from our origin without, perfect knowledge of the Good would require us to know all the consequences of our contemplated actions while perfect knowledge of the True would require us to know all the axiom sets which never beget a contradiction.As far as I could tell, and as far as I could see deciding with the empirical tests and theorem provers I could morally and mathematically envision devising, the above two tasks exceed the talents of mortal humans and all their technological extensions.But when it comes to Beauty, our form of being appears to have an inborn sense to guide us on our quest to the highest good. That way through beauty to our ultimate goal I called the “human‑hearted path”.<a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Aesthetics" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Aesthetics</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Ethics" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Ethics</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Logic</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Beauty" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Beauty</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Arete" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Arete</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Goodness" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Goodness</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Virtue" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Virtue</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Truth" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Truth</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/NormativeScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#NormativeScience</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Peirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Peirce</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Pragmata" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Pragmata</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/PragmaticCosmos" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#PragmaticCosmos</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/SummumBonum" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#SummumBonum</a>

Jon AwbreyPragmatic Maxim • Introduction • <a href="https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/07/pragmatic-maxim-2/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no">https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/07/pragmatic-maxim-2/</a>The “pragmatic maxim”, also known as the “maxim of pragmatism” or the “maxim of pragmaticism”, is a maxim of logic formulated by Charles Sanders Peirce. Serving as a practical recommendation or regulative principle in the normative science of logic, its function is to guide the conduct of thought toward the achievement of its purpose, advising the addressee on an optimal way of “attaining clearness of apprehension”.Charles Sanders Peirce • <a href="https://mywikibiz.com/Charles_Sanders_Peirce" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no">https://mywikibiz.com/Charles_Sanders_Peirce</a>Normative Science • <a href="https://mywikibiz.com/Normative_science" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no">https://mywikibiz.com/Normative_science</a><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Peirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Peirce</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Logic</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Inquiry" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Inquiry</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/PragmaticMaxim" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#PragmaticMaxim</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/RequlativePrinciple" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#RequlativePrinciple</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/CSPeirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#CSPeirce</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/CharlesSandersPeirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#CharlesSandersPeirce</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/NormativeScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#NormativeScience</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Semiotics" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Semiotics</a>

Jon AwbreyPragmatic Maxim • Et Sic Deinceps • <a href="http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/07/pragmatic-maxim-2/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no">http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08/07/pragmatic-maxim-2/</a>The pragmatic maxim is a guideline for the practice of inquiry formulated by Charles Sanders Peirce. Serving as a practical recommendation or regulative principle in the normative science of logic, its function is to guide the conduct of thought toward the achievement of its purpose, advising the addressee on an optimal way of “attaining clearness of apprehension”.<a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Peirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Peirce</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Logic</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Inquiry" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Inquiry</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/PragmaticMaxim" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#PragmaticMaxim</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/RequlativePrinciple" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#RequlativePrinciple</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/CSPeirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#CSPeirce</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/CharlesSandersPeirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#CharlesSandersPeirce</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/NormativeScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#NormativeScience</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Semiotics" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Semiotics</a>

Jon Awbrey<a href="https://types.pl/@maxsnew" class="u-url mention">@maxsnew</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Logic</a> is of course classically recognized as a <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/NormativeScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#NormativeScience</a> and C.S. <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Peirce" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Peirce</a> wrote a lot about the <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/LogicOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#LogicOfScience</a>, his analysis of <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/ScientificMethod" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#ScientificMethod</a> into three types of inference — <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Abduction" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Abduction</a>, <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Deduction" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Deduction</a>, and <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Induction" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#Induction</a>.

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#NormativeScience