What are we to make of fields which strongly overlap in method & subject? (I have in mind cognitive science and psychology, ML and stats.)
- Deep philosophical differences?
- Routing around a degenerate research programme?
(Cogsci was born when psych was in the grip of behaviourism, the great dead end.)
- Convergent development (incidental similarity of 2 initially distinct fields)
(Stats is certainly not degenerate, but ML is benefitting from being smaller, having less baggage IMO. Psych...)
A Mastodon instance for maths people. The kind of people who make \(\pi z^2 \times a\) jokes.
\) for inline LaTeX, and
\] for display mode.