Follow

It's pretty amusing that a big part of Matt Parker's legacy is having "Parker" being synonymous with being "almost correct" or a "near miss" (with big help from Brady Haran), to the point of being referenced in an actual maths preprint

@loke like an Uno Reverse to "the proof is trivial"

Imagine saying that to a panel during a thesis defence

@btcprox I don't usually read maths papers. Is things like this common?

It follows (we think?) that

K is a subring of the ring of integers of some cyclotomic field extension of the

rationals. That sounds useful but we weren’t able to do anything with it.

Elias Mårtenson@loke@functional.cafe@btcprox I'm reading the paper now, and I'm wondering if this is intentional. From page 2:

The Theorem follows immediately man.